A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) Latest News, India News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Sports : TodayIndya

Latest News

  • Home
  • Why Pakistan may not worry too much about US blocking military aid
Why Pakistan may not worry too much about US blocking military aid
Wednesday, January 3, 2018 IST
Why Pakistan may not worry too much about US blocking military aid

HIGHLIGHTS
*Security funding as well as economic-related funding to Pakistan by the US has already seen a sharp
  downswing since fiscal 2010
*Between 2002 and 2009, US aid to Pakistan averaged a little over $2.2 billion a year
*Total aid to Pakistan in fiscal year 2010 was $4.5 billion, whereas total aid in fiscal 2016 was $794 million
 

 
 

NEW DELHI: While the blocking today of significant military funds to Pakistan seems like stern action on the part of the US, which often doesn't follow up on its threats to Islamabad, it is worth bearing in mind that security funding as well as economic-related funding to Pakistan by the US has already seen a sharp downswing since fiscal 2010.
 
So, from being the country where most of US funds got funnelled to after 9/11, Pakistan has become relatively persona non grata, as far as US aid is concerned, in 2017.
Even more telling is that the numbers - sourced from the US's Congressional Research Service - put paid to the perception that Republicans carry a bigger stick, when it comes to their allies, than Democrats. They don't.
 
The numbers show that the biggest decline in US security- and economic-related funding to Pakistan happened during the years Barack Obama, a Democrat, was President of the US.
Consider this: Between 2002 and 2009, US aid to Pakistan averaged a little over $2.2 billion a year. Total aid to Pakistan in fiscal year 2010 was $4.5 billion, whereas total aid in fiscal 2016 was $794 million. Of this total aid, US security funding for Pakistan was $1.24 billion in 2010, which came down to a paltry $316 million in 2016.
That begs the question: Does today's announcement by the Trump administration, that it's blocking $225 million in security-related funding to Pakistan, have as much as an impact as it appears to?
 
The answer suggests itself in the graph below, which is a breakdown of US economic and security aid to Pakistan since 2010.
 
 
Consider this now: Historically, Pakistan has been among the top recipients of US aid. Since 1948, the US has pledged more than $30 billion in direct aid, about half for military assistance, and more than two-thirds appropriated in the post-2001 period, according to a 2013 Congressional Research Service report.
This was what Trump was talking about in his first tweet of 2018: "The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!"
 
 
Consider this now: Historically, Pakistan has been among the top recipients of US aid. Since 1948, the US has pledged more than $30 billion in direct aid, about half for military assistance, and more than two-thirds appropriated in the post-2001 period, according to a 2013 Congressional Research Service report.
This was what Trump was talking about in his first tweet of 2018: "The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!"
 
The data however shows the US has been saying "no more" since 2010, and more dramatically, since 2011 - the year that US Special Forces hunted down and killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. The Obama administration came under increasing pressure on US largesse to Pakistan, and significantly scaled down - without Trump's bluster - both economic and military aid.

 
 

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

 
 
 

Trending News & Articles

 

More in

 
 
 

   Prashnavali

  Thought of the Day

Live in such a way, that if your children are ever asked for the definition of kindness, love, mentor, integrity & loyalty, they answer ”My Parents”..Good Morning
Anonymous

Be the first one to comment on this story

Close
Post Comment
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST


ads
Back To Top