Latest News

  • Home
  • Doing away with the toss in Test cricket: Logical or illogical?
Doing away with the toss in Test cricket: Logical or illogical?
Saturday, May 19, 2018 IST
Doing away with the toss in Test cricket: Logical or illogical?

With news on Thursday that cricket’s governing body, the International Cricket Council (ICC), is mulling the move to scrap the count toss at the start of Test matches, the sport’s oldest ritual has come under fire. The toss of coin has been part of international cricket since the very first Test in 1877, but over the past couple of years its relevance has been questioned with critics raising the matter of exaggerated home advantage.
 

 
 

In England, county cricket has made the toss optional for first-class games, with the visiting captain opting to bowl first if he wishes; however, if a captain wants to bat first, the toss is still required.
 
As expected, voices were immediately raised against the ICC’s pondering of scrapping the toss. Former India captain and spinning great Bishen Singh Bedi has opposed the idea, saying that tinkering with a 140-year-old tradition was not a sensible move. Another former India captain, Dilip Vengsarkar, echoed Bedi in raising the issue of cricket already being tinkered with too much. According to Vengsarkar ICC would be better off introducing neutral curators, just as it does with its elite panel of umpires and match referees.
 
Among those who have been critical of the toss are Michael Holding and Steve Waugh, who argued that it encourages home teams to produce pitches of their presence, which puts visiting sides at a disadvantage.
The toss has for nearly a century-and-a-half provided captains with an equal opportunity, and it is that challenge that adds to the allure of Test cricket. Whether this historical aspect of Test cricket gets ratified by ICC ahead of next year’s Ashes — which will be the starting point for matches that count towards the inaugural Test Championship — remains to be seen. But for now it appears a radical decision which will continue to divide opinion.
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

 
 
 

Trending News & Articles

 

More in

 
 
 

   Prashnavali

  Thought of the Day

“Never underestimate the importance of having a person in your life who can always make you smile.”
Anonymous

Be the first one to comment on this story

Close
Post Comment
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST


ads
Back To Top