Input string was not in a correct format.A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) Latest News, India News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Sports : TodayIndya

Latest News

  • Home
  • In Huge Battle With Reliance, Amazon's Big Win In Supreme Court Today
In Huge Battle With Reliance, Amazon's Big Win In Supreme Court Today
Thursday, August 12, 2021 IST
In Huge Battle With Reliance, Amazon

The Singapore Emergency Arbitrator in October 2020 restrained Future Retail from going ahead with its merger with Reliance Retail. That decision is valid and enforceable, the Supreme Court said today. The arbitrator has yet to announce a final decision.
 

 
 

New Delhi: In a big win for Amazon, the Supreme Court today said Reliance cannot go ahead with a $3.4 billion deal to buy Future Group's retail assets. The deal has locked Mukesh Ambani and Jeff Bezos, rivals for India's online retail, in a huge legal battle.
 
Here's your 10-point cheatsheet to this big story:
 
1. Amazon had taken its partner Future Group to court saying it violated contracts by agreeing to sell retail assets to market leader Reliance Industries last year for ₹ 24,731 crore.
 
2. The Singapore Emergency Arbitrator in October 2020 restrained Future Retail from going ahead with its merger with Reliance Retail. That decision is valid and enforceable, the Supreme Court said today. The arbitrator has yet to announce a final decision.
 
3. Amazon went to the Delhi High Court urging that the arbitrator's decision be enforced. The single judge bench said the deal should be on hold, directed that the assets of Future's Kishore Biyani be seized and asked why he should not face a three-month jail term.
 
4. In February, a bigger Delhi High Court bench stayed the single judge order that had effectively blocked the deal. Amazon then approached the Supreme Court, which has now confirmed the High Court single judge's order.
 
5. Shares of Reliance and Future Group fell after the order. The Future Group said it would pursue all possible avenues to complete the Reliance deal and "protect the interests of its stakeholders and workforce".
 
6. Amazon had argued that it has committed $6.5 billion in investments in India and would face "irreparable harm" if the Supreme Court did not intervene.

 
 

7. The legal fight over Future's assets pits two of the world's richest men - Amazon's Jeff Bezos and Reliance's Mukesh Ambani - as rivals fighting for dominance over India's colossal online retail sector.
 
8. Amazon has argued that a 2019 deal it had with a Future unit included clauses saying the Indian group couldn't sell its retail assets to anyone on a "restricted persons" list, including Reliance. Amazon has a 49 per cent stake in Future Coupons Ltd, which holds 9.82 per cent in Future Retail.
 
9. Future, India's second-largest retailer with over 1,700 stores, has said it will be pushed towards liquidation if the deal with Reliance falls through.
 
10. The acquisition of Future Group, which owns some of India's best-known supermarket brands, such as Big Bazaar, would have strengthened Reliance's presence in the hugely competitive e-commerce sector. 

 
 

Source :

 
 
 

Related Topics

 
 
 

Trending News & Articles

 

More in

 
 
 

   Prashnavali

  Thought of the Day

"Plant seeds of happiness, hope, success, and love; it will all come back to you in abundance. This is the law of nature."
Anonymous

Be the first one to comment on this story

Close
Post Comment
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST


ads
Back To Top