Latest News

Who Really Won The 1965 Indo-Pak War? We Take A Look At Both Sides Of The Story
Friday, September 22, 2017 IST
Who Really Won The 1965 Indo-Pak War? We Take A Look At Both Sides Of The Story

In the August of 1965, Pakistani forces infiltrated India-occupied Kashmir in what they called Operation Gibraltor. Their troops carried extra-ammunition and entered posing as locals of the area and their attack on Indian soil led to war without a formal declaration, disrupting peace in the valley. On September 22, it ended after intervention of the UN and a ceasefire was formally declared the next day.

But who won?

While our textbooks taught us that we did, people from across the border believe that they were victorious.

There has been a debate over this for a long, long time now. To understand the situation, we need to turn the pages of history and find out what really happened 52 years ago. And for that, we need to first look at both versions of the events, India's and Pakistan's.

Let's look at our neighbours' version first. Here's an excerpt from a Class 5 textbook that we found in an article published in the Dawn:
The Pakistan Army conquered several areas of India, and when India was at the verge of being defeated she ran to the United Nations to beg for a cease-fire. Magnanimously, thereafter, Pakistan returned all the conquered territories to India.

The books also blamed Hindus staying in West Pakistan by claiming that their true loyalties lay with India and that they would send their savings back to India, thus harming the economy of their country.

And here's our version:

In a fierce battle, the Indian Army reached close to Lahore. The hostilities came to an end with UN intervention. Though India could conflict considerable military loss on Pakistan, the 1965 war  added to India's already difficult economic situation.
 

 
 

Confused?

Well, why don't we look at a few neutral versions and research findings from other parts of the world that could shed light on the outcome.

According to the Federal Research Division of the US, the war would have ended in our favour:

"The war was militarily inconclusive; each side held prisoners and some territory belonging to the other. Losses were relatively heavy—on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan. Most Pakistanis, schooled in the belief of their own martial prowess, refused to accept the possibility of their country's military defeat by "Hindu India" and were, instead, quick to blame their failure to attain their military aims on what they considered to be the ineptitude of Ayub Khan and his government."

Similar was the report of one Arif Jamal, a New York Times correspondent, who wrote a book called Shadow Wars:

"This time, India's victory was nearly total: India accepted cease-fire only after it had occupied 740 square miles, though Pakistan had made marginal gains of 210 square miles of territory. Despite the obvious strength of the Indian wins, both countries claim to have been victorious."

Historian John Keay wrote this in his book 'India: A History':
"The 1965 Indo-Pak war lasted barely a month. Pakistan made gains in the Rajasthan desert but its main push against India's Jammu-Srinagar road link was repulsed and Indian tanks advanced to within a sight of Lahore. Both sides claimed victory but India had most to celebrate."

Many other reports suggested the same thing. Under the orders of then Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri, Indian forces had marched on to Lahore and were in striking distance of the cantonment while denying the enemy's attempt to capture Indian territory.

Losses were much heavier on the Pakistani side. But the UN called for a ceasefire and there was no victor. But if you think about it, Pakistan's aim was to conquer a large part of our territory but they did not. While our aim was to repel their forces, and we did.

So whose mission do you think was successful?

It is important to note that a ceasefire had been ordered at the Rann of Kutch after ceasefire violations from April through June of the same year (1965). But Pakistan had believed that after India's loss to China in 1962, perhaps our forces weren't equipped enough to win a war and they attacked again. Well, those beliefs were certainly thwarted.

 
 

Battles were fought both on land and in the air.

Pakistani forces had managed to capture an area called Khemkaran, but they were pushed back by Indian troops, who managed to reach the outskirts of Lahore. Post that, the ceasefire was accepted on the 22nd and the war ceased on the 23rd of September. The Tashkent Agreement was signed by Ayub Khan and Lal Bahadur Shastri in the January of 1966 to formally resolve the war. Lal Bahadur Shastri died the next day.

Neutral assessments suggest our superiority in the war. But yes, technically it remains militarily inconclusive. And it resulted in losses on both sides, economically as well.

Maybe what they say is true - "In war, there are no winners."
There have been many ceasefire violations recently as well, but our brave soldiers continue to defend our borders. A salute to all our armed forces who continue to protect us bravely.
 

 
 

Source :

 
 
 

Related Topics

 
 
 

Trending News & Articles

 Article
12 Early Signs Of Lung Cancer To Never Ignore

Lung cancer is usually not noticeable during the early stages. Most people are diagnosed when the disease is at an advanced stage. According to Cancer.org, it is ...

Recently posted . 8K views . 2 min read
 

 Article
11 Surprising Benefits Of Wood Apple Or Bael Fruit

The health benefits of wood apple include [1] relief from constipation, indigestion, peptic ulcer, piles, respiratory problems, diarrhea, and dysentery. It also b...

Recently posted . 5K views . 2 min read
 

 Article
10 Amazing Benefits Of Bael (Kaitha)

Bael, also known as the “Wood Apple”, is a species native to India. The bael tree is considered to be sacred to the Hindus. A famous drink known as sh...

Recently posted . 5K views . 2 min read
 

 Article
These 7 Remedies Can Remove The Milia (Milk Spots) From Your Face

Do you know what milia are? Milia is a skin condition which causes the appearance of small white hard bumps on the skin which usually appear on the face, neck or ch...

Recently posted . 5K views . 2 min read
 

 
 

More in History & Classics

 Article
Marble Cake Recipe

Ingredients: 1.120 gms melted Butter 2.160 gms Sugar 3.3 Eggs 4.200 gms Flour (Maida) 5.1/2 cup milk

Recently posted. 887 views . 6 min read
 

 Article
Best Pressure Cookers in India

COOKERS BRANDS

Recently posted. 1K views . 33 min read
 

 Article
Text Neck: How Smartphones Are Damaging Our Spines

Do you spend hours hunched down looking into your cellphone?

Recently posted. 771 views . 0 min read
 

 Video
Bikaner- The Desert Haven



Recently posted . 1K views
 

 Article
Take a breather: After yoga, meditation, breathwork gains popularity among fitness freaks

long a key part of meditation and some kinds of yoga, breathwork is now becoming a discipline in its own right, with proponents offering classes, one-on-one sessi...

Recently posted. 835 views . 1 min read
 

 Article
Morning is the best time for a workout — especially if you’re a man

Previous research has already suggested that working out in the morning, while quite difficult at times, can be the best way to build a sustainable habit. A new stu...

Recently posted. 901 views . 1 min read
 

 
 
 

   Prashnavali

  Thought of the Day

Always try to smile, because your smile can give other people a reason to smile too.
Anonymous

Be the first one to comment on this story

Close
Post Comment
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST


ads
Back To Top