A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) Boxer Vijender Singh wins 11th consecutive pro bout, Sports : Today Indya

Latest News

All about property rights in India
Friday, March 20, 2020 IST
All about property rights in India

We examine the property rights of daughters, of daughters-in-law, abandoned first wife, second-wife, converts, adopted children, widows, mothers, etc., under the Hindu Succession Act
 

 
 

Two-thirds of all the cases pending in Indian courts pertain to property or related frauds. There is no end to family scuffles when it comes to property. Recently, the Supreme Court (SC) ruled that owning a property is a human right. By an amendment to the Constitution Act, 1978, right to property ceased to be a fundamental right but in a welfare state property ownership rights is still a human right and nobody can dispossess the other without a strong basis. Let us examine the property rights of Indian individuals as per the Hindu Succession Act 1956.
 
What is the Hindu Succession Act?
 
The Hindus Succession Act (HSA) applies to all Hindus, Buddhist, Jain and Sikhs. It even applies to those who have converted to any of these religions or are born out of wedlock. The Hindu Succession Act does not apply to Indian Muslims and Christians since they have their personal law to determine how property would be inherited by their legal heirs. In this article, we examine the property rights of all those on whom the HSA applies. The HSA comes into question when a Hindu dies intestate (without leaving a will). Thereafter, succession depends upon the rules as carried in the HSA.
 
In case of a Hindu man dying intestate, his property goes to the following and in this order of preference. The following chart shows the rightful heirs as per HSA.
 
 *Note: Agnates are relations through the males but not by blood or adoption. These can be relations through marriages. Cognates are relations through the females.
 
 
Class-I heirs Class-II heirs Agnates Cognates
i. Son

 

ii. Daughter

iii. Widow

iv. Mother

v. Son of a predeceased son

vi. Daughter of predeceased son

vii. Widow of predeceased son

viii. Son of a predeceased daughter

ix. Daughter of predeceased daughter

x. Son of predeceased son of predeceased son

xi. Daughter of predeceased son of a predeceased son

xii. Widow of predeceased son of a predeceased son

i. Father

 

ii. (1) Son’s daughter’s son, (2) son’s daughter’s daughter, (3) brother, (4) sister

iii. (1) Daughter’s son’s son, (2) daughter’s son’s daughter, (3) daughter’ daughter’s son, (4) daughter’s daughter’s daughter.

iv. (1) Brother’s son, (2) sister’s son, (3) brother’s daughter, (4) sister’s daughter.

v. Father’s father; father’s mother.

vi. Father’s widow; brother’s widow.

vii. Father’s brother; father’s sister.

viii. Mother’s father; mother’s mother

ix. Mother’s brother; mother’s sister.

Example: Father’s brother’s son or even father’s brother’s widow.

 

Rule 1: Of two heirs, the one who is in nearer line is preferred.

Rule 2: Where the number of degrees of ascent is the same or none,  that heir is preferred who is closer to the common ancestor.

Rule 3: Where  neither heir is entitled to be  preferred to the other under Rule 1 or Rule 2 they take simultaneously.

Example: Father’s sister’s son or brother’s daughter’s son

 

Rule 1: Of two heirs, the one who is in nearer line is preferred.

Rule 2: Where the number of degrees of ascent is the same or none,  that heir is preferred who is closer to the common ancestor.

Rule 3: Where  neither heir is entitled to be  preferred to the other under Rule 1 or Rule 2 they take simultaneously

 
 
Property rights of daughters
 
The HSA was amended in 2005, and it gave equal rights to the daughter in terms of property. Prior to 2005, sons enjoyed rights over the deceased father’s property whereas daughters could do so only till she was unmarried. It was understood that post-marriage, a woman attaches herself to the husband’s family and is, therefore, a rightful in another Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) altogether. Now, married and unmarried daughters have the same rights on their father’s property as their brothers. They are also entitled to equal duties, liabilities as their brothers.
 
In 2005, it was also ruled that a daughter has the same rights provided that both father and daughter were alive on September 9, 2005. In 2018, the SC stated that a daughter can inherit her deceased father’s property no matter whether the father was alive on this date or not. Hereon, women were also accepted as coparceners. They can demand a share in the father’s property.
 
Property rights of mother on son’s property
 
A mother is a legal heir to her deceased son’s property. Therefore, if a man leaves behind his mother, wife and children, all of them have an equal right on his property. Do note that if the mother passes away without creating a will, her share in her son’s property will devolve upon her legal heirs, including her other children.
 
Property rights of an adopted child
 
An adopted child is also a Class-I heir and enjoys all the rights that a biological child is entitled to. However, an adopted child cannot stake claim to his adoptive father’s property in case this father was disqualified from succeeding to any property because of a crime that he might have committed. If the father had converted to any other religion and the adopted child is practising the same religion as well, even in this case, the adopted child cannot inherit the ancestral property.
 
Property rights of an abandoned first wife
 
Suppose a Hindu man leaves his wife without a divorce and marries another. In this case, his first marriage has not been annulled by law and the first wife and their children are lawful heirs. If the two are divorced, the first wife cannot stake any claim in the property and all her belongings are solely hers.
 
Even in the case where the husband and wife may have contributed towards the purchase of a property, it is important to have documented proof of percentage of monetary contribution of each in case of a divorce. This is important especially in case you want to file a property eviction suit.

 
 
 
 
 

Related Topics

 
 
 

Trending News & Articles

 Article
Why You Need a Will and the Consequences if You Die Without it

If you think Wills are only for the rich, you are absolutely wrong. A Will is an essential part of any estate plan. It is the primary document for transferring your...

Recently posted . 8K views . 5 min read
 

 Article
Godrej Properties sells ₹575 crore flats in Noida in just one day

Godrej Properties Ltd. (GPL) today announced that it has sold 340 homes with an area of more than half a million square feet on the first day of launch

Recently posted . 4K views . 1 min read
 

 Article
Inheritance in Absence of A Will under Indian Succession Act

An intestate death often causes chaos with family often ending up fighting to get property. The succession act was created to resolve the impending chaos when a per...

Recently posted . 3K views . 2 min read
 

 Article
Residential Real Estate 7 notable trends that may emerge amid the COVID 19 crisis

The unprecedented crisis put across by the COVID-19 outbreak has impacted the residential real estate significantly. Here are a few notable trends that are likely t...

Recently posted . 3K views . 1 min read
 

 
 

More in Real Estate

 Article
Clinical India Register Comprehensive Eight Wicket Victory Over Pakistan

Dubai: India ticked all boxes as they decimated Pakistan by eight wickets in a lopsided Asia Cup group league encounter on Wednesday. ...

Recently posted. 813 views . 1 min read
 

 Article
Mithali Raj to lead Indian women’s cricket team in South Africa

  Mithali Raj was declared the captain of the Indian women’s cricket team as BCCI announced the squad for their upcoming ODI series agai...

Recently posted. 845 views . 1 min read
 

 Article
Shikhar Dhawan dominates Don Bradman, Virender Sehwag vs Sri Lanka in Galle Test

Shikhar Dhawan’s scintillating 190 on the opening day of the first Test against Sri Lanka at Galle on Wednesday put him at par with batting greats like Sir Do...

Recently posted. 934 views . 13 min read
 

 Article
MS Dhoni vs Virat Kohli vs Rohit Sharma: Dinesh Karthik points out captaincy differences of the trio

Wicket-keeper batsman Dinesh Karthik has explained the difference in captaincy styles of leaders MS Dhoni, Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma, having played under all of ...

Recently posted. 1K views . 1 min read
 

 Article
New Zealand seek home revival, Pakistan target Test No.1 ranking

Pakistan and New Zealand both claimed the high floor at the eve of Thursday’s first take a look at in Christchurch, with the hosts drawing inspiration from Br...

Recently posted. 839 views . 24 min read
 

 
 
 

   Prashnavali

  Thought of the Day

Don’t talk, just act. Don’t say, just show. Don’t promise, just prove.
Anonymous

Be the first one to comment on this story

Close
Post Comment
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST
Shibu Chandran
2 hours ago

Serving political interests in another person's illness is the lowest form of human value. A 70+ y old lady has cancer.

November 28, 2016 05:00 IST


ads
Back To Top