SC:No Intra-Court Appeal Against Condonation Of Delay By The Single Judge In Plea To Set Aside Arbitration Award
Thursday, April 20, 2017 IST
The Supreme Court, in Union of India vs M/S Simplex Infrastructures, has reiterated that intra-court legal instrument charm beneath clause fifteen of the legal instrument of court at city isn't reparable against AN order gone by the one choose on AN application for pardon of delay filed in conjunction with the petition for setting aside AN arbitration award A division bench of city court, holding that intra-court charm is reparable against single choose order condoning the delay, had reversed the order by invoking its jurisdiction beneath legal instrument charm.
Referring to the choice in Fuerst Day Lawson restricted vs Jindal Exports restricted, the bench comprising Justice Dipak Misra and Justice AM Khanwilkar command that the remedy of legal instrument charm against that call is unavailable and also the question as-as to whether the one choose had justly exercised the discretion or otherwise may well be assailed before the apex court by approach of special leave petition.
Even if the learned single choose might have committed manifest error or wrong set the appliance for a pardon of delay, that judgment is imputable to exercise jurisdiction under Section 34(3) of the Act,” the bench said.
The court also noted that that remedy of appeal has been provided only against an order of setting aside or refusing to set aside an arbitral award under Section 34(1) (c) and no appeal is provided against an order passed by the court of competent jurisdiction condoning the delay in filing the petition under Section 34 of the Act as such .
The bench also disapproved of the ratio in the high court judgment, which had distinguished the decision in Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd by holding that the judgment of the single judge of condoning the delay in filing of the petition under Section 34 of the Act was without jurisdiction and not in terms of the provisions of the Act.
“It is not possible to countenance this approach,” the bench said allowing the appeal against the division bench order.
Related Topics
Trending News & Articles
While the Uttarakhand High Court has asked to block 857 websites, the Ministry of Electronics and IT (Meity) found 30 portals without any pornographic content.
...
Recently posted . 64K views . 1 min read
The four boys as well as five school officials, including the director and principal, were arrested after the incident. The minors were presented before the Juvenil...
Recently posted . 10K views . 1 min read
Rahul was having an Italian passport and was carrying suitcase full of dollars. Some say it was about was it $2 million.
Rahul and his girl friend was th...
Recently posted . 9K views . 7 min read
True – Tr...
Recently posted . 8K views . 83 min read
More in National
Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cap: PM Modi marked the freedom fighter's birth anniversary on Wednesday by inaugurating the Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose museum at the...
Recently posted. 937 views . 1 min read
Petrol prices touched Rs 74.95 per litre in Delhi, Rs 77.65 in Kolkata, Rs 82.79 in Mumbai and Rs 77.77 in Chennai.
Recently posted. 741 views . 0 min read
Union Minister Manoj Sinha informed that around 3.7 lakh beneficiaries will get arrears from January 1, 2016 which will be paid out in a single installment
Recently posted. 840 views . 1 min read
Recently posted . 1K views
Recently posted . 498 views
Recently posted . 2K views
Recently posted . 2K views
Recently posted . 3K views . 88 min read
Recently posted . 4K views . 94 min read
UP CM Yogi Adityanath on Tuesday announced that the Cabinet has approved the construction of Ganga Expressway. According to Adityanath, this will be the world's...
Recently posted. 1K views . 1 min read
She is not a chattel. She does not want to live with you. How can you say that you will live with her? You (man) cannot force her, the court said
Recently posted. 830 views . 1 min read