Won't Allow Gay Sex In The Army, Says Chief General Rawat, National : Today Indya

Won't Allow Gay Sex In The Army, Says Chief General Rawat

National

dailyo

When asked about the Supreme Court ruling on adultery, he said the Army is "very conservative".

HIGHLIGHTS

1. We don't enjoy some rights, privileges you enjoy, said Bipin Rawat

2. He also said adultery can't be allowed "to perpetrate into the army"

3. The Supreme Court has struck down anti-adultery, anti-gay sex laws

NEW DELHI: Gay sex is not acceptable in the Indian Army, its chief General Bipin Rawat said on Thursday when asked to comment on the Supreme Court decriminalizing homosexuality last year.

"Hum logon ke yahan nahi chalega (We will not allow this to happen in the Army) In the army

LGBT issues... are not unacceptable. We will still be dealing with them under various sections of the Army Act," said General Rawat, addressing his annual press conference.

"We are not above the country's law but when you join the Indian Army, some of the rights and privileges you enjoy are not what we have. Some things are different for us, but we are certainly not above the Supreme Court." he said.

"We will have to see how we take a call, let us also see how it comes into the society, whether it's accepted or not...I can't say what will happen two years down the road."

A five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court last September unanimously decriminalised a part of a colonial-era law under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which banned "consensual unnatural sex", saying it violated the rights to equality.

Asked about the Supreme Court also ruling that adultery is not a crime, General Rawat said the Army is "very conservative".

He added, "We are neither modernised, nor westernised."

The army chief was asked these questions after a former general suggested in an article that the armed forces can continue to enforce their own rules on gay sex and adultery even after the Supreme Court orders.

Article Original Source : https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/wont-allow-gay-sex-in-the-army-says-chief-g...

Why Muslims have the first claim on any new ‘backward’ quota

National

livemint

Though the general category reservation bill is being sold as a pre-election sop for upper castes, data shows that if the government seeks out the poorest of the eligible poor, the quota should almost entirely go to Muslims

While announcing its proposal for 10% general category reservation for economically poor upper castes, representatives of the government said that the reservation would apply to all groups not covered by existing quotas, including Muslims and other religious minorities. Though the move is being sold as a pre-election sop for upper castes, data shows that if the government seeks out the poorest of the eligible poor, the quota should almost entirely go to Muslims.

However, the eligibility criteria have been made overly broad, meaning that nearly everyone in the country will be eligible.

The Narendra Modi government has said that it intends for the eligibility cut-off to be a household income of ₹8 lakh per year. Families owning agricultural land above five acres, a house above 1,000 sq. ft, or a 100 yard plot or above in a notified municipal area or a plot of 200 sq. yards or above in a non-notified municipal area will not be eligible.

On average, a little over the top 1% of the country has a household income of over ₹8 lakh, according to data from the 2011-12 India Human Development Survey (IHDS) conducted jointly by the National Council for Applied Economic Research and the University of Maryland.

But among groups that are not currently covered by reservations, Muslims undoubtedly stand out as the poorest. The average Indian annual household income was ₹1.13 lakh as of 2011-12, with scheduled castes and scheduled tribes earning the least, followed by Muslims and then other backward classes (OBCs).

Upper castes are the richest, with a household income nearly one-and-a-half times the Indian average. Also, as of 2011-12, less than 3% of rural households owned over five acres of land, and the proportion is just 1% among Muslims, according to data from the National Sample Survey Office.

Using a wealth index from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), Nitin Kumar Bharti, a doctoral student at the Paris School of Economics, found that as of 2005-06, along with backward castes, Muslims formed a substantial share of the poorest one-fifth of Indians, while forward castes were rare in this group.

A Mint analysis of NFHS 2015-16 data found that even ten years later, Muslims are under-represented among the affluent while forward castes are over-represented.

In terms of affluence, Muslims were found to be on par with OBCs but in terms of higher educational attainments, Muslims lagged behind OBCs.

Moreover, things are getting worse for Muslims, likely as a result of a lack of quotas. Since the mid-1950s, intergenerational mobility—the opportunity for a boy to do better in life than his father—has improved for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, but fallen for Muslims.

The economists Sam Asher, Paul Novosad, and Charlie Rafkin of the World Bank, Dartmouth and MIT respectively used educational outcomes as a proxy for overall mobility and found that the expected educational rank of a Muslim child has fallen substantially over the last 20 years and intergenerational mobility is now considerably worse among Muslims than among SCs and STs.

“Higher caste groups have experienced constant and high upward mobility over time, a result that contradicts a popular notion that it is increasingly difficult for higher caste Hindus to get ahead,” the authors wrote.

There is evidence to suggest that quotas can improve educational outcomes. Guilhem Cassan, an economist at the University of Namur in Belgium, took advantage of a natural experiment which occurred in 1976, when the lists of SCs were harmonized across states for the first time since Independence, giving fresh SC status to 250,000 people.

Cassan compared the educational levels of those people who had SC status since Independence, and those who were of school-going age when they got SC status in 1976, and found that access to the SC status led to an improvement in years of schooling, literacy and numeracy levels.

By creating an over-broad eligibility criteria, the Modi government has opened up the proposed new quota to virtually all Indians not currently covered by reservations—half of the country in all.

Their backwardness should ensure that Muslims have first claim to any new affirmative action.

But if they have to compete with forward caste Hindus for a small share of reserved college spots and jobs, Muslims might find themselves the last to be picked.

In terms of affluence, Muslims were found to be on par with OBCs but in terms of higher educational attainments, Muslims lagged behind OBCs.

Article Original Source : https://www.livemint.com/Politics/3uqMGQ3o4UMhtdHnxaGocO/What-the-general-c...